Cascadity Audio
← All streams

#energy

Everything tagged energy, across every stream.

0

Oil falls more than 14% in a week as the US and Iran talk and Vance blames the war for midterm losses

CNBC's daily oil reports trace a fast reversal: from pricing in post-election strikes on Iran to betting on a deal.

Crude prices dropped sharply in the first days of November. Oil fell more than 7% on Monday, November 2, after Washington and Tehran signaled openness to a settlement, and fell again Tuesday, with Brent settling at $103.60 and WTI at $96.09, CNBC reports. CNBC also cites a Wall Street Journal report that the US struck Iran's Qeshm Island on Monday as part of 'limited strikes' in recent weeks.

On Wednesday, after Democrats swept Congress, Vice President JD Vance posted 'The reason we lost is the war.' WTI fell 8.3% to $88.12 and Brent 8.7% to $94.62, leaving oil down more than 14% for the week. Analysts told CNBC the market now expects Trump to have a bigger incentive to make a deal; Trump told the Financial Times he had no immediate plans to strike Iran. Others warned the selloff may be overdone and that escalation risk remains, with ship attacks continuing in and around the Strait of Hormuz.

Rabbit Holes 2
0

Brent crude settles at a six-month high above $116 on reports of planned US strikes on Iran after the midterms

CNBC tracks the week's swings and the Houthi attacks on Saudi oil sites that keep a risk premium in prices.

Brent crude rose 3.1% on October 23 to settle at $116.72 a barrel, its highest settlement since April 29, and gained 6.2% for the week, its third straight weekly rise. US West Texas Intermediate settled at $103.27. CNBC reports the move followed a New York Times report, citing US officials, that the US and Israel plan fresh strikes on Iran after the midterm elections, while Iran-allied Houthi militants kept attacking Saudi Arabia.

Prices eased early in the week, with Brent settling at $115.81 on October 26, then rose again on October 28 to $115.32 after The Wall Street Journal reported the US had told Gulf Arab countries to be ready for a short, intense campaign after the midterms. CNBC also reports the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve stood at 282.6 million barrels, its lowest since 1982.

Rabbit Holes 2
0

Brent crude tops $113, its highest since May, on a report of planned strikes on Iran after the midterms

CNBC explains what moved oil this week, from the New York Times report to the Houthi attacks in Saudi Arabia.

Brent crude rose 4% to settle at $113.17 a barrel on October 22, its highest close since May 4, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate gained 2.4% to $99.47.

CNBC reports the jump followed a New York Times report, citing unnamed U.S. officials, that U.S. and Israeli militaries have drawn up plans for renewed strikes on Iran after next month's midterm elections. President Trump told reporters the U.S. is not negotiating with Iran and that something will happen "fairly soon." The U.S. also ordered non-emergency government staff and families to leave Saudi Arabia, citing rising Houthi attacks; Saudi state media said at least two people were killed in an attack on Dammam's airport.

Yahoo Finance notes Brent is up more than 50% since the Iran war began in late February. One fund manager quoted by CNBC argues households are less exposed to oil shocks than decades ago.

Rabbit Holes 2
0

Google signs for 3.6 GW from Constellation, including upgraded nuclear plants

The context on PJM's power shortfall explains why data-center deals now come with new generation attached.

Google contracted for 3,590 megawatts of power from Constellation Energy in PJM, the largest U.S. grid, Reuters reports. That includes a 20-year agreement for 890 megawatts from upgrades at 11 existing nuclear units in Illinois, Pennsylvania and New Jersey, with the first power expected in 2028, and a 15-year supply deal for another 2,700 megawatts not tied to a specific source. Constellation will invest more than $4.3 billion. The companies present it as a response to PJM's proposal that data centers bring their own power.

Rabbit Holes 1
0

EPA eliminates federal greenhouse-gas limits for power plants

The rollback sits at the center of the U.S. fight over climate policy, electricity costs and how much regulatory power the EPA should have.

What happened

The EPA repealed federal rules limiting greenhouse-gas emissions from power plants, reversing a major climate-policy initiative and reducing federal requirements on coal- and gas-fired electricity generation.

Republican / administration case

The administration argues that the rules imposed high costs on power producers, threatened grid reliability and exceeded the EPA's appropriate regulatory role.

Democratic / critic case

Democrats and environmental groups argue that power plants are a major source of greenhouse gases and that eliminating limits increases climate and health risks while slowing the shift toward cleaner energy.

Libertarian / Cato case

The libertarian view is more divided than the partisan framing suggests. Cato generally favors less prescriptive federal regulation, but Cato legal scholar Jonathan Adler has argued that the administration's broader legal case for reversing the EPA's greenhouse-gas endangerment framework is unconvincing.

Where the disagreement really is

This is both a climate-policy argument and an administrative-law argument: how serious the external costs of emissions are, what policies efficiently address them, and what Congress actually authorized EPA to do.

From each bank
Rabbit Holes 2
  • Massachusetts v. EPA (2007)

    The Supreme Court ruling that greenhouse gases are air pollutants the EPA can regulate: the legal foundation at the center of this fight.

    Wikipedia · Wade · 5 min

    0
  • West Virginia v. EPA (2022)

    The ruling that limited the EPA's power-plant climate authority, the first time the Court explicitly cited the "major questions" doctrine.

    Wikipedia · Swim · 30 min

    0