Justice Department sues to hold up Alaska's Senate result if Peltola wins; a report says her campaign helped recruit the second Dan Sullivan
Alaska Public Media lays out the state's legal answer to the suit; AP's report has the text-message revelations and every side's response.
On October 22 the Justice Department sued Alaska's Division of Elections in federal court, asking it to block or delay certification of the U.S. Senate race if Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan loses to Democrat Mary Peltola but would have won had the votes for a second candidate, Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. of Petersburg, gone to him. President Trump said he ordered the suit. The state's Department of Law answered that the suit "has no legal basis": the ballot labels the senator as the Republican incumbent, voters can rank both Sullivans, and probing voter intent would breach the secret ballot. Peltola's campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee moved to dismiss. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski said the department "should have never filed this lawsuit."
On October 28, AP reported that The New York Times had obtained texts in which Peltola campaign members discussed recruiting people named Dan Sullivan. Trump said Peltola and the other Sullivan "should be prosecuted"; Murkowski said Alaskans "deserve the honest truth." Peltola's campaign says it "has no involvement with either Sullivan campaign," the DSCC denies involvement, and Dan J. Sullivan has long denied any contact with Peltola's campaign. Legal experts told AP the report won't change the lawsuit. Election Day is November 3.
Across the spectrum 3
Democrat
Mary Peltola's campaign (Democratic Senate candidate): In a statement reported by AP on October 28, the campaign said Peltola entered the race because "Alaskans deserve a champion who is fighting to lower their costs and put Alaska first, and no tweet or threat from any DC politician will keep her away from that fight," and that it "has no involvement with either Sullivan campaign."
ClickOnDetroit (AP) ↗Libertarian
Joe Lancaster, Reason: Lancaster argues the suit is unjustified and late, writing that "it's completely inappropriate to treat an election as fair only if your candidate wins" and that "the ranked-choice ballot itself can take care of this problem."
Reason ↗Republican
President Donald Trump: Responding on October 28 to the Times report, Trump said of Peltola and the other Sullivan, "I think they should be prosecuted," and posted that "Peltola should suffer the Legal and Political consequences for what she has done." He had earlier directed the Justice Department to file the certification suit.
ClickOnDetroit (AP) ↗-
Spoiler effect
After exploring Trump calls for prosecution of Democratic Alaska Senate candidate over spoiler candidate controversy, the theory behind the whole fight is Spoiler effect.
In social choice theory and politics, a spoiler effect happens when a losing candidate changes an election's outcome just by running; voting rules immune to it are called spoilerproof.
Wikipedia · Swim · 30 min
0