#fishing

What happened: Oceanographer Sylvia Earle, 91, called for ending krill fishing near Antarctica as the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) met in Australia, the AP reported. Officials from the US, China, Russia and 24 other governments are weighing an industry-backed plan to expand krill fishing. The fishery shut early in August for the second year in a row after trawlers, mostly from Norway and China, hit the 620,000-tonne limit.

Why it matters: Krill feed whales, seals, penguins, fish and birds. Most of the catch becomes farmed-fish feed and omega-3 capsules. CCAMLR's own scientific committee and environmental groups want any increase paired with a large marine protected area near the Antarctic Peninsula, first proposed by Argentina and Chile a decade ago.

How much agreement is there? Highly contested. Earle says "there is no sustainable extraction of krill in Antarctica possible." Aker BioMarine's CEO says independent science, including a UN FAO assessment, backs the fishery, and supports a protected area along with a higher quota spread over a wider area. Talks on the protected area have been deadlocked for years.

Could someone help? Shoppers can check where omega-3 supplements come from, and ocean groups follow CCAMLR's decisions closely.

What happened: On Oct. 15, Greenland's parliament, Inatsisartut, told the government to bring a law in early 2027 that suspends seabed mining until at least the end of 2029. It could then be extended by two years. All 17 members present voted yes, across party lines. Inuit Ataqatigiit's Pipaluk Lynge first proposed it in February, citing worries about foreign interest in deep-sea mining and harm to fishing and game animals.

Why it matters: More than 90% of Greenland's exports come from fishing. Jenseeraq Poulsen of Oceans North Kalaallit Nunaat says anything that risks those waters is "a wager against the part of [the economy] that already works." The vote came a day after U.S. President Donald Trump said "massive" oil, gas and mineral exploration was about to begin in Greenland.

How much agreement is there? Some disagreement. Poulsen calls it "a decision to decide," not protection, because the actual law is still to come. Centrist MP Juno Berthelsen says the pause balances protecting the sea with staying open to future opportunities.

What happened: New rules published in Mexico's official gazette on Oct. 14 cut the Upper Gulf of California area where gillnets are banned by about 86%. Fishing reopens across roughly 10,000 km² that had been closed since 2020. Mexico's environment ministry, Semarnat, says the change follows a CITES recommendation to focus patrols on the 225 km² "Zero Tolerance Area" where vaquitas are seen most. President Claudia Sheinbaum said long bans have hurt fishing families' well-being.

Why it matters: A 2025 survey estimated only seven to 10 vaquitas remain, down from more than 550 in 1997. Gillnets, including illegal ones set for the totoaba fish, whose swim bladder sells on the black market, are the main thing killing them.

How much agreement is there? Highly contested. Alex Olivera of the Center for Biological Diversity called it "absolutely shocking" and warned it likely means extinction. Baja California's governor called it "great news" for fishing communities. Inside Climate News reports the rules also open a boat corridor through the Zero Tolerance Area, and San Felipe fishermen briefly blockaded the road out of town over it. Researcher Valeria Towns says paying fishermen to stay out is the fairest way to enforce the zone.

Could someone help? Talks on paying fishermen to stay out of the restricted zone are still going on, and that is the approach Towns backs. Refusing totoaba products undercuts the black market that drives the illegal nets.