Cascadity Audio
← Community Views
0

r/LocalLLaMA cheers Linus Torvalds' reply rejecting 'don't use AI' rules for Linux kernel work

Torvalds' mailing-list reply in full, and a useful debate on where AI help ends and low-effort patches begin.

The post is a screenshot of a Linux kernel mailing-list reply in which Linus Torvalds calls the idea of "don't use AI for X" rules "idiotic" and, mockingly, proposes banning compilers and text editors for kernel submissions. He writes that he expects people "to understand what they are doing," and that this has "very little to do with what tools they use." The Next Web reports the reply came on October 13 after kernel maintainers moved to drop the "Assisted-by" tag that had asked contributors to disclose AI coding tools.

The top replies agree that quality work should be accepted regardless of where it came from, while others stress the other half of his message: contributors must understand their code. Several worry that AI makes it easy to flood open-source projects with low-quality pull requests that take maintainers time to sift. About 3,100 upvotes in a 329,000-member community.

Read it at the source
Cascadic Analysis 1
UndertowDelayed Consequence / False Success Problem

What hidden risk could pull against this, even if the news is good?

Torvalds' standard is that contributors must understand their code, whatever the tool. Dropping the "Assisted-by" tag also drops the record of which patches came from AI tools. If a kind of mistake those tools tend to make shows up years later in code that passed review, maintainers won't have an easy way to find the other patches that might share it.

0
Rabbit Holes 1